<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The FDA is Stupid, Take 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joggerslife.com/2010/the-fda-is-stupid-take-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joggerslife.com/2010/the-fda-is-stupid-take-2/</link>
	<description>I&#039;ll probably never win, but I&#039;ll definitely never quit!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: aj</title>
		<link>http://www.joggerslife.com/2010/the-fda-is-stupid-take-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7146</link>
		<dc:creator>aj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joggerslife.com/?p=2663#comment-7146</guid>
		<description>I agree too , but the food pyramid is completely wrong, humans are not supposed to have grains, or dairy, it messes up our system. But it&#039;s just stupid to increase serving sizes! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree too , but the food pyramid is completely wrong, humans are not supposed to have grains, or dairy, it messes up our system. But it&#8217;s just stupid to increase serving sizes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whole Body Love</title>
		<link>http://www.joggerslife.com/2010/the-fda-is-stupid-take-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2869</link>
		<dc:creator>Whole Body Love</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 04:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joggerslife.com/?p=2663#comment-2869</guid>
		<description>Insanity.  I agree.  Serving sizes should be based on needed daily value.  People will not learn what a healthy serving looks like if we keep expanding the size</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Insanity.  I agree.  Serving sizes should be based on needed daily value.  People will not learn what a healthy serving looks like if we keep expanding the size</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara</title>
		<link>http://www.joggerslife.com/2010/the-fda-is-stupid-take-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2752</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joggerslife.com/?p=2663#comment-2752</guid>
		<description>Even whole grains really are not that great for humans...but certainly better than junk.

FDA might as well stand for : Fictional, Deaf Ears and Actionless!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even whole grains really are not that great for humans&#8230;but certainly better than junk.</p>
<p>FDA might as well stand for : Fictional, Deaf Ears and Actionless!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joggersl</title>
		<link>http://www.joggerslife.com/2010/the-fda-is-stupid-take-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2748</link>
		<dc:creator>joggersl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joggerslife.com/?p=2663#comment-2748</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re totally right.  I&#039;m a nimrod.  I know that the USDA regulates the food pyramid.  I spent 2 years listening to my dietitian teach me about it.  I was all rantish and got lost in my thoughts...clearly.  lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re totally right.  I&#8217;m a nimrod.  I know that the USDA regulates the food pyramid.  I spent 2 years listening to my dietitian teach me about it.  I was all rantish and got lost in my thoughts&#8230;clearly.  lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.joggerslife.com/2010/the-fda-is-stupid-take-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2746</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joggerslife.com/?p=2663#comment-2746</guid>
		<description>I think that upping listed portion sizes will not change how Americans eat, but I think that maybe a few people would think twice if they saw that the calories for their crap food were 824 instead of 275 (and it&#039;s 3 servings!), because I think more people look at calories listed than serving size. 

I think the answer is more in line with &quot;stop promoting fake &#039;health initiatives&#039; and labeling food &#039;healthy&#039; just because the cereal only has 78 million grams of sugar instead of the national average of 79 million grams.&quot; (i.e. the now defunct Smart Choices program.)

The USDA food pyramid is pretty good (the FDA doesn&#039;t handle that kind of stuff, just the regulation of the foods) - my nutritionist bases all her recommendations off of it - and . I am certainly not going to go out &amp; say that the alphabet agencies are all fantastic, but I think that this isn&#039;t a completely unrealistic change. Obviously the best choice would be for consumers to stop eating crappy pre-packaged foods, but perhaps (and I have not studied this extensively - just read the NYT article you linked to) this will jolt people into realizing how much they&#039;re actually eating.

You made a great point when you said a lot of people are not using measuring cups &amp; food scales - and since they&#039;re not, why not make the listed serving size a more accurate representation of what people are eating?

What would be ideal (or a packaging nightmare, depending on who you are) would be the recommended serving size &amp; the average serving size listed next to each other. 

Of course, since we are such enlightened eaters, we&#039;ll continue to monitor satiety &amp; come out the winners in the long run. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that upping listed portion sizes will not change how Americans eat, but I think that maybe a few people would think twice if they saw that the calories for their crap food were 824 instead of 275 (and it&#8217;s 3 servings!), because I think more people look at calories listed than serving size. </p>
<p>I think the answer is more in line with &#8220;stop promoting fake &#8216;health initiatives&#8217; and labeling food &#8216;healthy&#8217; just because the cereal only has 78 million grams of sugar instead of the national average of 79 million grams.&#8221; (i.e. the now defunct Smart Choices program.)</p>
<p>The USDA food pyramid is pretty good (the FDA doesn&#8217;t handle that kind of stuff, just the regulation of the foods) &#8211; my nutritionist bases all her recommendations off of it &#8211; and . I am certainly not going to go out &amp; say that the alphabet agencies are all fantastic, but I think that this isn&#8217;t a completely unrealistic change. Obviously the best choice would be for consumers to stop eating crappy pre-packaged foods, but perhaps (and I have not studied this extensively &#8211; just read the NYT article you linked to) this will jolt people into realizing how much they&#8217;re actually eating.</p>
<p>You made a great point when you said a lot of people are not using measuring cups &amp; food scales &#8211; and since they&#8217;re not, why not make the listed serving size a more accurate representation of what people are eating?</p>
<p>What would be ideal (or a packaging nightmare, depending on who you are) would be the recommended serving size &amp; the average serving size listed next to each other. </p>
<p>Of course, since we are such enlightened eaters, we&#8217;ll continue to monitor satiety &amp; come out the winners in the long run. <img src='http://www.joggerslife.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

